Penilaian Risiko Ergonomi dalam Kegiatan Pemungutan Getah Pinus: Analisis Postur Kerja Statis (Ergonomics Risk Assessment in Pine Resin Harvesting: A Static Postural Analysis)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23960/jsl19104-120
Abstract View: 2195
Abstract
Pine resin is one of the non-timber forest products commodity that has excellent prospects. Pine resin harvesting is generally divided into two main activities: tapping and collecting works. Collecting activity that is commonly done under manual technique is classified as manual material handling that can trigger musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs). This work posture study offers an overview of MSDs disruption level faced by workers. Therefore, the proper corrective action can be taken. Motion sequences in selected work cycles were captured by using the Kinovea software. Work posture analysis was performed by a combination of the natural range of motion (SAG), Rapid Upper-Limb Assessment (RULA), and Rapid Entire Body Assessment (REBA). SAG analysis shows that the body’s parts having a high probability of being injured are the back and shoulders. Work posture analysis using RULA and REBA verified that bending or half bending may cause MSDs. The ergonomics risk in these positions might be higher due to the influence of load and repetitive factors. Reducing the posture of bending/half bending, reducing the weight of the resin bucket, and taking a short break/rest in between work activities should be considered as potential strategies in reducing the ergonomics risks that may occur during the resin collection work.
Keywords: forestry workers, musculoskeletal disorders, non-timber forest products, oleoresin, natural range of motion
Downloads
References
BPS. 2017. Statistik Perusahaan Pembudidaya Tanaman Kehutanan 2016. BPS (Badan Pusat Statistik), Jakarta, Indonesia.
Chaffin, D.B., and Andersson, G. 1991. Occupational Biomechanics. Second Edition. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, USA.
Chaffin, D.B., Andersson, G.B.J., and Martin, B.J. 1999. Occupational Biomechanics. Third Edition. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, USA.
Cheng, T.S., and Lee, T.H. 2003. Maximum Acceptable Weight of Lift for Asymmetric Lifting. Perceptual and Motor Skills 96(3): 1339–1346. DOI: 10.2466/pms.2003.96.3c.1339
Chiasson, M. ève, Imbeau, D., Aubry, K., and Delisle, A. 2012. Comparing the Results of Eight Methods Used to Evaluate Risk Factors Associated with Musculoskeletal Disorders. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 42(5): 478–488. DOI: 10.1016/j.ergon.2012.07.003
Collins, J.D., and O’Sullivan, L.W. 2015. Musculoskeletal Disorder Prevalence and Psychosocial Risk Exposures by Age and Gender in a Cohort of Office Based Employees in Two Academic Institutions. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 46: 85–97. DOI: 10.1016/j.ergon.2014.12.013
Cunningham, A.B. 2011. Non-Timber Products and Markets: Lessons for Export-Oriented Enterprise Development from Africa. in: Non-timber Forest Products in the Global Context S. E. Shackleton, C. M. Shackleton, and P. Shanley, eds. Springer, Heidelberg, Germany 285. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-17983-9_4
Dempsey, P.G., McGorry, R.W., and Maynard, W.S. 2005. A Survey of Tools and Methods Used by Certified Professional Ergonomists. Applied Ergonomics 36(4): 489–503. DOI: 10.1016/j.apergo.2005.01.007
Ferguson, S.A., Allread, W.G., Le, P., Rose, J., and Marras, W.S. 2013. Shoulder Muscle Fatigue During Repetitive Tasks as Measured by Electromyography and Near-Infrared Spectroscopy. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 55(3): 1077–1087. DOI: 10.1177/0018720813482328
Han, K.S., Rohlmann, A., Zander, T., and Taylor, W.R. 2013. Lumbar Spinal Loads Vary with Body Height and Weight. Medical Engineering and Physics 35: 969–977. DOI: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2012.09.009
Herzog, V., and Buchmeister, B. 2015. The Review of Ergonomics Analysis for Body Postures Assessment, Chapter 14. in: DAAAM International Scientific Book B. Katalinic, ed. DAAAM International 153–164. DOI: 10.2507/daaam.scibook.2015.14
Hignett, S., and McAtamney, L. 2000. Rapid Entire Body Assessment (REBA). Applied Ergonomics 31(2): 201–205. DOI: 10.1016/S0003-6870(99)00039-3
Huysamen, K., Looze, M. de, Bosch, T., Ortiz, J., Toxiri, S., and O’Sullivan, L.W. 2018. Assessment of an Active Industrial Exoskeleton to Aid Dynamic Lifting and Lowering Manual Handling Tasks. Applied Ergonomics 68: 125–131. DOI: 10.1016/j.apergo.2017.11.004
Janowitz, I.L., Gillen, M., Ryan, G., Rempel, D., Trupin, L., Swig, L., Mullen, K., Rugulies, R., and Blanc, P.D. 2006. Measuring the Physical Demands of Work in Hospital Settings: Design and Implementation of an Ergonomics Assessment. Applied Ergonomics 37(5): 641–658. DOI: 10.1016/j.apergo.2005.08.004
Kee, D., and Karwowski, W. 2007. A Comparison of Three Observational Techniques for Assessing Postural Loads in Industry. International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics 13(1): 3–14. DOI: 10.1080/10803548.2007.11076704
Kumar, S. 2001. Theories of Musculoskeletal Injury Causation. Ergonomics 44(1): 17–47. DOI: 10.1080/00140130120716
Manuele, F.A. 2011. Accident Costs. Rethinking Ratios of Indirect to Direct Costs. Professional Safety 56(1): 39–47.
Marras, W.S., and Davis, K.G. 1998. Spine Loading During Asymmetric Lifting Using One Versus Two Hands. Ergonomics 41(6): 817–834. DOI: 10.1080/001401398186667
McAtamney, L., and Corlett, E.N. 1993. RULA: a Survey Method for the Investigation of Work-Related Upper Limb Disorders. Applied Ergonomics 24(2): 91–99. DOI: 10.1016/0003-6870(93)90080-S
Namwongsa, S., Puntumetakul, R., Neubert, M.S., Chaiklieng, S., and Boucaut, R. 2018. Ergonomic Risk Assessment of Smartphone Users Using The Rapid Upper Limb Assessment (RULA) Tool. PLoS ONE 13(8): 1–16. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0203394
Niebel, B.W., and Freivalds, A. 1999. Methods, Standards, and Work Design. McGraw-Hill, Michigan, USA.
Openshaw, S., and Taylor, E. 2006. Ergonomics and Design A Reference Guide. Allsteel Inc., Iowa, United States.
Pope, D.P., Croft, P.R., Pritchard, C.M., Silman, A.J., and Macfarlane, G.J. 1997. Occupational Factors Related to Shoulder Pain and Disability. Occupational and Environmental Medicine 54(5): 316–321. DOI: 10.1136/oem.54.5.316
Sakka, S., Chablat, D., Ma, R., and Bennis, F. 2015. Predictive Model of The Human Muscle Fatigue: Application to Repetitive Push-Pull Tasks With Light External Load. International Journal of Human Factors Modelling and Simulation 5(1): 81–97. DOI: 10.1504/ijhfms.2015.068124
UN Comtrade. 2019. United Nations Commodity Trade Statistics Database. <https://comtrade.un.org/db/dqBasicQueryResults.aspx?px=H2&cc=3805&r=360> (Jul. 17, 2020).
Waters, T.R., Putz-Anderson, V., Garg, A., and Fine, L.J. 1993. Revised NIOSH Equation for the Design and Evaluation of Manual Lifting Tasks. Ergonomics 36(7): 749–776. DOI: 10.1080/00140139308967940
Yovi, E., Takimoto, Y., Ichihara, K., and Matsubara, C. 2005. Factors Affecting Workload and Work Efficiency in Pine Resin Harvesting Operations in Java’s Plantation Forests. Journal of The Japan Forest Engineering Society 20(3): 141–150. DOI: 10.18945/jjfes.KJ00007485372
Yovi, E.Y., and Nurrochmat, D.R. 2018. An Occupational Ergonomics in the Indonesian State Mandatory Sustainable Forest Management Instrument: A Review. Forest Policy and Economics 91: 27–35. DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2017.11.007
Yovi, E.Y., and Prajawati, W. 2015. High Risk Posture on Motor-Manual Short Wood Logging System in Acacia mangium Plantation. Jurnal Manajemen Hutan Tropika (Journal of Tropical Forest Management) 21(1): 11–18. DOI: 10.7226/jtfm.21.1.11
Yovi, E.Y., Takimoto, Y., Ichihara, K., and Matsubara, C. 2006. A Study of Workload and Work Efficiency in Timber Harvesting by Using Chainsaw in Pine Plantation Forest in Java lsland-Thinning Operation. Applied Forest Science 15(1): 23–31. DOI: 10.20660/applfor.15.1_23
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 Licence that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
