SHUTER, THE INNOVATION TOOLS TO REPLACE STONE FOR HANDLINE BAIT OF TUNA

Authors

  • Mustasim Mustasim Politeknik Kelautan dan Perikanan Sorong
  • Misbah Sururi Politeknik Kelautan dan Perikanan Sorong, Indonesia
  • Muh Kasim Politeknik Kelautan dan Perikanan Sorong, Indonesia
  • M. Ali Ulat Politeknik Kelautan dan Perikanan Sorong, Indonesia
  • Muhfizar Muhfizar Politeknik Kelautan dan Perikanan Sorong, Indonesia
  • Muhammad Maskur Politeknik Kelautan dan Perikanan Bone, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23960/aqs.v11i1.p%25p
Abstract View: 257

Abstract

Tuna bait handline is used to catch small pelagic fish, the catch of which is used as tuna handline bait. Unfortunately, the tools used are natural beach stones, whose presence is dwindling, hard to find and also threatens beach abrasion. The purpose of this study was to find an effective, easy-to-use tool as a substitute for natural stone ballast in the tuna bait handline with the glass pump fishing method. The method used is the experimental method. This research is divided into two stages, namely preliminary research to determine the length of the shutter wire and the main research to determine the ideal weight and its effectiveness on the catch. Preliminary research from July to August 2021, followed by core research, namely testing shutter devices with different weights. (300gr, 400gr and 500gr) were repeated 4 times at FAD Makbon, Kab. Sorong in September 2021. Data analysis used a Completely Randomized Design, and qualitative descriptive to describe the best Shuter construction and the results of testing the effectiveness of the shutter with the fisherman's bait handline. The total fish caught on the three Shuters were 53 fish, with a total weight of 112, 66 kg. The composition of the catch consisted of 53 baby tuna (80,485 kg), 11 salmon (7,687 kg), 7 tuna (22,864 kg), and 3 skipjack tuna (1,630 kg). The length of stainless wire required for Shuter is 80 cm, the ideal Shuter weight and is stable enough to operate in FADs is 300 gr, 400 gr and 500 gr. The response of the fish caught was mostly on Shuter with a length of 80 cm and a weight of 400 gr.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Darondo, F.A., Halim, S. and Wudianto, W. (2020) “Modifikasi pemberat hand line dengan inovasi menggunakan pemberat batu beton pada penangkapan tuna di Pelabuhan Perikanan Samudera (PPS) Bitung,” ejournal.unsrat.ac.id, 05(02), pp. 35–45.

Hikmah, N., Kurnia, M. and Amir, F. (2016) “Pemanfaatan Teknologi Alat Bantu Rumpon untuk Penangkapan Ikan di Perairan Kabupaten Jeneponto,” Jurnal IPTEKS PSP, 3(6), pp. 455–468.

Karyanto, K., Arifin, M.Z. and Katili, L. (2021) “Teknik Pengoperasian Hand Line Tuna dengan Metode Pemberat Batu dan Minyak Cumi di Perairan Laut Maluku,” JURNAL BLUEFIN FISHERIES, 2(2), p. 1. doi:10.15578/jbf.v2i2.71.

Karyanto, K., Reppie, E. and Budiman, J. (2015) “Perbandingan hasil tangkapan tuna hand line dengan teknik pengoperasian yang berbeda di Laut Maluku,” JURNAL ILMU DAN TEKNOLOGI PERIKANAN TANGKAP, 1(6), pp. 221–226. doi:10.35800/jitpt.1.6.2014.6960.

Subani, W. and Barus, H.R. (1989) Alat dan cara penangkapan ikan di Indonesia. Lembaga penelitian Perikanan Laut.

Sudirman, H. and Achmar, M. (2012) Teknik Penangkapan Ikan Penerbit Rineka Cipta.

Tauladani, S.A., Arifin, M.Z. and Wijaya, N. (2013) “The effect of artificial and natural baits on the capture of tuna hand line around the Molucca Sea,” AQUATIC SCIENCE & MANAGEMENT, 1, p. 57. doi:10.35800/jasm.0.0.2013.2279.

Wudianto, W. et al. (2019) “Kajian Pengelolaan Rumpon Laut Dalam Sebagai Alat Bantu Penangkapan Tuna Di Perairan Indonesia,” Jurnal Kebijakan Perikanan Indonesia, 11(1), p. 23. doi:10.15578/jkpi.1.1.2019.23-37.

Downloads

Published

2022-11-06

How to Cite

Mustasim, M., Sururi, M., Kasim, M., Ulat, M. A., Muhfizar, M., & Maskur, M. (2022). SHUTER, THE INNOVATION TOOLS TO REPLACE STONE FOR HANDLINE BAIT OF TUNA. AQUASAINS, 11(1), 1209–1218. https://doi.org/10.23960/aqs.v11i1.p%p

Issue

Section

Articles