Economic Analysis of Beef Cattle Production Under Extensive and Semi-Intensive Management Systems in Sorong Regency, Southwest Papua
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23960/jipt.v13i1.p216-228
Keywords:
Beef cattle, Extensive, Production economics, Semi-intensiveAbstract
The length the research aims to determine the livestock profile and explore sustainable production income on beef cattle farms with different rearing systems in Sorong Regency. Data collection uses the Participatory Rural Appraisal method, which is an approach that involves family members or.Individuals to analyze the reality of the living conditions they live in. This research involved 90 breeders who were selected using purposive sampling based on 4 considerations. The analysis used to test the differences in different maintenance systems is the independent T-test analysis. The research results show that the number of cows in the extensive system was higher than in the semi-intensive system (P<0.05). The same thing applies to net body weight production, production economics, the economics of the function of livestock as savings and insurance, extensive breeders are higher than semi-intensive breeders (P<0.05). The total income/benefit of intensive breeders is higher than extensive breeders IDR. 42,423 ± 26,162 million vs. IDR. 19,952 ± 11,116 million. Based on the research results, it can be concluded that the extensive livestock system produces high income and has the potential to maintain their livestock in a sustainable manner than the semi-intensive system.Downloads
References
Alwi, L. O., Iswandi, R. M., Gafaruddin, A., and Zani, M. 2023. Economics of Beef Cattle Fattening Business in Different Environmental Areas in South Konawe Regency, Southeast Sulawesi Province. Jurnal Ilmu dan Teknologi Peternakan Tropis 10(2) 310–317. DOI: 10.33772/jitro.v10i2
Badan Pusat Statistik. 2023. Kabupaten Sorong dalam Angka 2023. Badan Pusat Statistik Kabupaten Sorong, Indonesia.
Budisatria, I. G. S., Baliarti, E., Satya, T., Widi, M., Ibrahim, A., and Andri, B. 2019. Reproductive Management and Performances of Aceh Cows, Local Indonesian Cattle Kept by Farmers in A Traditional System. American-Eurasian Journal of Sustainable Agriculture 21–31. DOI: 10.22587/aejsa.2019.13.3.3
Budisatria, I. G. S., Guntoro, B., Sulfiar, A. E. T., Ibrahim, A., and Atmoko, B. A. 2021. Reproductive management and performances of Bali cow kept by smallholder farmers level with different production systems in South Konawe Regency, Indonesia. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science 782(2). DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/782/2/022079
Budisatria, I. G. S., Udo, H. M. J., Eilers, C. H. A. M., Baliarti, E., and van der Zijpp, A. J. 2010. Preferences for sheep or goats in Indonesia. Small Ruminant Research 88(1): 16–22. DOI: 10.1016/j.smallrumres.2009.11.002
Dedeh, D., Sari, K., Busono, W., and Nugroho, H. 2016. Cattle Production Performance in Semi-Intensive and Extensive Farming System from Jembrana District, Bali, Indonesia. Research in Zoology 6(2): 17–20. DOI: 10.5923/j.zoology.20160602.01
Dung, D. V., Roubík, H., Ngoan, L. D., Phung, L. D., and Ba, N. X. 2019. Characterization of Smallholder Beef Cattle production system in central vietnam -revealing performance, trends, constraints, and future development. Tropical Animal Science Journal 42(3): 253–260. DOI: 10.5398/tasj.2019.42.3.253
Hetharia, C. dan Kalami, M. (2022) ‘Analisis Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Minat Masyarakat Distrik Makbon Kabupaten Sorong Dalam Mengembangkan Ternak sapi Bali’, Jurnal Jendela Ilmu, 2(2); 48–53. doi: 10.34124/ji.v2i2.99.
Haq, M. S., Budisatria, I. G. S., Panjono, and Maharani, D. 2016. Farmer profiling of jabres cattle at breeding center in bantarkawung, brebes, central java province, indonesia. International Journal of Agriculture, Forestry and Plantation 4(2012): 51–55.
Haq, M. S., Budisatria, I. G. S., Panjono, P., and Maharani, D. 2019. Measuring the sosial economic benefits of Jabres cattle keeping in Bantarkawung Sub-district, Brebes, Central Java, Indonesia. Journal of the Indonesian Tropical Animal Agriculture 44(2): 220–227. DOI: 10.14710/jitaa.44.2.220-227
Indey, S., Saragih, E. W., and Santoso, B. 2022. Karakteristik Peternak Sapi di Sentra Produksi Ternak Potong Di Kabupaten Sorong. Jurnal Ilmu Peternakan dan Veteriner Tropis 11(3): 245. DOI: 10.46549/jipvet.v11i3.257
Kirsopp-Reed, K. 1994. A review of PRA methods for livestock research and development. RRA Notes 20: Livestock 20(20): 11–36.
Moll, H. A. J. 2005. Erratum: Costs and benefits of livestock system and the role of market and nonmarket relationships (Agricultural Economics 32 (181-194)). Agricultural Economics 33(1): 181–193. DOI: 10.1111/j.1574-0862.2005.33_1_01.x
Ouma, E. A., Obare, G. A., and Staal, S. J. 2003. Cattle as assets: Assessment of non-market benefits from cattle in Smallholder Kenyan crop-Livestock Systems. Proceedings of the 25th International Conference of Agricultural Economists (IAAE). 16 – 22 August 2003, Durban, South Africa (August): 328–334.
Ouma, E. A., Obare, G. A., and Staal, S. J. 2004. The socio-economic dimensions of smallholder livestock management in Kenya and its effects on competitiveness of crop-livestock systems. Uganda Journal of Agricultural Sciences 9(1): 31–37.
Paggasa, Y., and Abdillah, A. H. 2022. Analisis Strategi Sosial Pengembangan Model Usaha Integrasi Kelapa Sawit dan Sapi di Kecamatan Muara Wahau Kabupaten Kutai Timur. Jurnal Ekonomi Pertanian dan Agribisnis 6(2): 743. DOI: 10.21776/ub.jepa.2022.006.02.35
Sirajuddin, S. N., Nurlaelah, S., Amrawaty, A., T, A., Rohani, S., and Saleh, I. M. 2017. Relationship Between Farmers Characteristic and Income From Beef Cattle with the Traditional Profit-Sharing. American-Eurasian Journal of Sustainable Agriculture 11(5): 29-34.
Sulfiar, A. E. T., Agustin, C., and Nugroho, T. 2022. Profile and Income of Bali Cattle Farmers under Different Farming Systems in Southeast Sulawesi. Jurnal Ilmu dan Teknologi Peternakan Tropis 9 (2): 536-542. DOI: 10.33772/jitro.v9i2.24162
Sulfiar, A. E. T., Atmoko, B. A., Guntoro, B., and Budisatria, I. G. S. 2020a. The Profiling of the Farmers with Semi-Intensive and Intensive Cattle Production Systems in South Konawe District, Southeast Sulawesi Province. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science 465(1). DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/465/1/012061
Sulfiar, A. E. T., Atmoko, B. A., Guntoro, B., and Budisatria, I. G. S. 2020b. Study of Pasture Productivity for Semi-Intensive Cattle System during Dry Season in the South Konawe Regency, Southeast Sulawesi. Buletin Peternakan 44(3): 85–91. DOI: 10.21059/buletinpeternak.v44i3.52742
Widi, T. S. M., Udo, H. M. J., Oldenbroek, K., Budisatria, I. G. S., Baliarti, E., Viets, T. C., and van der Zijpp, A. J. 2015. Is cross-breeding of cattle beneficial for the environment? The case of mixed farming systems in Central Java, Indonesia. Animal Genetic Resources/Ressources génétiques animales/Recursos genéticos animales 57(October): 1–13. DOI: 10.1017/s2078633615000259
Widi, T. S. M., Udo, H., Oldenbroek, K., Budisatria, I. G. S., Baliarti, E., and der Zijpp, A. van. 2021. Designing genetic impact assessment for crossbreeding with exotic beef breeds in mixed farming systems. Outlook on Agriculture 50(1): 34–45. DOI: 10.1177/0030727020915206
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Jurnal Ilmiah Peternakan Terpadu(JIPT) is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).