Multidimensional Sustainability Analysis of Forest and Land Rehabilitation Program in Bombana Regency, Southeast Sulawesi, Indonesia

  • Hartati
    Universitas Muhammadiyah Kendari
  • Sitti Rosmalah
    Universitas Muhammadiyah Kendari
  • Sarwati
    Universitas Muhammadiyah Kendari
DOI: https://doi.org/10.23960/jtepl.v15i4.1397-1408
Keywords Bombana, Ecology, Forest management, RAPS, RHL, Sustainability
Abstract Views (Last 12 Months)
0 Abstract Views
4 Downloads

Abstract

Forest and land degradation remains a significant environmental challenge in Bombana Regency, Southeast Sulawesi, Indonesia, requiring rehabilitation strategies that ensure long-term sustainability. This study evaluated the sustainability status of the Forest and Land Rehabilitation (RHL) program and identified the key factors influencing its performance. Sustainability was assessed using the Rapid Appraisal for Sustainability (RAPSUS) approach based on Multidimensional Scaling (MDS) across the ecological, economic, and social dimensions using 21 attributes. Data were collected through field observations, structured interviews, and expert judgment involving relevant stakeholders. Model performance was evaluated using stress values, coefficients of determination (R²), leverage analysis, and Monte Carlo simulations. The results indicated that the RHL program was moderately sustainable, with the ecological dimension showing the highest sustainability index (62.82), followed by the economic (58.61) and social (52.09) dimensions. Leverage analysis identified flora species diversity, planting success rate, and clarity of area boundaries as the most influential attributes affecting sustainability. The MDS model demonstrated good reliability, with stress values ranging from 0.1477 to 0.1529 and R² values ranging from 0.9408 to 0.9432. These findings highlight the importance of improving vegetation diversity, increasing planting success, and strengthening stakeholder participation to enhance the long-term sustainability of RHL programs and support adaptive rehabilitation policies.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2008). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 543-571. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mum032

BAPPENAS (Badan Perencanaan Pembangunan Nasional). (2020). Rencana Pembangunan Jangka Menengah Nasional (RPJMN) 2020–2024. Kementerian PPN - Badan Perencanaan Pembangunan Nasional, Jakarta.

Bellwood-Howard, I., Bhasme, S., Bixler, R.P., Boedhihartono, A.K., Carmenta, R., Jedd, R., de Jong, W., Lake, F.K., Latawiec, A., Lippe, M., Rai, N.D., Sayer, J., van Dexter, K., Vira, B., Visseren-Hamakers, I., Wyborn, C., & Yang, A. (2020). Putting the pieces together: Integration for forest landscape restoration implementation. Land Degradation & Development, 31(4), 419–429. https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.3448

Castro, J., Morales-Rueda, F., Navarro, F.B., Löf, M., Vacchiano, G., & Alcaraz-Segura, D. (2021), Precision restoration: A necessary approach to foster forest recovery in the 21st century. Restoration Ecology, 29, e13421. https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.13421

César, R.G., Belei, L., Badari, C.G., Viani, R.A.G., Gutierrez, V., Chazdon, R.L., Brancalion, P.H.S., & Morsello, C. (2021). Forest and landscape restoration: A review emphasizing principles, concepts, and practices. Land, 10(1), 28. https://doi.org/10.3390/land10010028

Chazdon, R.L. (2018). Beyond deforestation: Restoring forests and ecosystem services on degraded lands. Science, 320(5882), 1458–1460. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1155365

Crouzeilles, R., Curran, M., Ferreira, M.S., Lindenmayer, D.B., Grelle, C.E.V., & Benayas, J.M.R. (2016). A global meta-analysis on the ecological drivers of restoration success. Nature Communications, 7, 11666. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms11666

Di Sacco, A., Hardwick, K.A., Blakesley, D., Brancalion, P.H.S., Breman, E., Cecilio, L., Chomba, S., Dixon, K., Elliott, S., Ruyonga, G., Shaw, K., Smith, P., Smith, R.J., & Antonelli, A. (2021). Ten golden rules for reforestation to optimize carbon sequestration, biodiversity recovery and livelihood benefits. Global Change Biology, 27(7), 1328–1348. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.15498

Erbaugh, J.T., Pradhan, N., Adams, J., Oldekop, J.A., Agrawal, A., Brockington, D., Pritchard, R., & Chhatre, A. (2020). Global forest restoration and the importance of prioritizing local communities. Nature Ecology & Evolution, 4(11), 1472–1476. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-020-01282-2

Fauzi, A. (2019). Teknik Analisis Keberlanjutan. PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama. ISBN: 9786020630250.

Fischer, H.W., Chhatre, A., Duddu, A., Pradhan, N., & Agrawal, A. (2023). Community forest governance and synergies among carbon, biodiversity and livelihoods. Nature Climate Change, 13, 1340–1347. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-023-01863-6

Kavanagh, P., & Pitcher, T.J. (2004). Implementing Microsoft Excel software for Rapfish: A technique for the rapid appraisal of fisheries status. Fisheries Centre Research Reports, 12(2). https://dx.doi.org/10.14288/1.0074801

Kleinschmit, D., Brockhaus, M., Blum, M., Karambiri, M., Kröger, M., Ramcilovic-Suominen, S., Reinecke, S., & Ongolo, S. (2024). Forest (landscape) restoration governance: Institutions, interests, ideas, and their interlinked logics. In Restoring Forests and Trees for Sustainable Development. Edited by: Katila, P., Colfer, C.J.P., de Jong, W., Galloway, G., Pacheco, P., & Winkel, G. Oxford University Press, New York: 47-73. https://doi.org/10.1093/9780197683958.003.0003

KLHK (Kementerian Lingkungan Hidup dan Kehutanan). (2020). Peraturan Menteri Lingkungan Hidup dan Kehutanan Republik Indonesia Nomor P.16/MENLHK/SETJEN/KUM.1/8/2020 tentang Rencana Strategis Kementerian Lingkungan Hidup dan Kehutanan Tahun 2020–2024. Kementerian Lingkungan Hidup dan Kehutanan, Jakarta.

KLHK (Kementerian Lingkungan Hidup dan Kehutanan). (2021). Status Lingkungan Hidup Indonesia 2021. Kementerian Lingkungan Hidup dan Kehutanan, Jakarta.

Mansourian, S. (2016). Understanding the relationship between governance and forest landscape restoration. Conservation and Society, 14(3), 267–278. https://doi.org/10.4103/0972-4923.186830

Mansourian, S., & Vallauri, D. (2014). Restoring forest landscapes: Important lessons learnt. Environmental Management, 53(2), 241–251. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-013-0213-7

Meli, P., Holl, K.D., Benayas, J.M.R., Jones, H.P., Jones, P.C., Montoya, D., & Mateos, D.M. (2017). A global review of past land use, climate, and active vs. passive restoration effects on forest recovery. PLOS ONE, 12(2), e0171368. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0171368

Ota, L., Firn, J., Chazdon, R.L., Gregorio, N., Mukul, S.A., Viani, R.A.G., Romero, C., & Herbohn, J. (2021). Using leading and lagging indicators for forest restoration. Journal of Applied Ecology, 58(9). https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.13938

Owusu, R., Kimengsia, J.N., & Giessen, L. (2024). Institutional change and compliance in forest landscape restoration governance: Insights from the Western Highlands of Cameroon. International Forestry Review, 19(1), 36–58. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 1747423X.2024.2322602

Pitcher, T.J., & Preikshot, D. (2001). RAPFISH: A rapid appraisal technique to evaluate the sustainability status of fisheries. Fisheries Research, 49(3), 255–270. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-7836(00)00205-8

Reed, M.S., Graves, A., Dandy, N., Posthumus, H., Hubacek, K., Morris, J., Prell, C., Quinn, C.H., & Stringer, L.C. (2009). Who's in and why? A typology of stakeholder analysis methods for natural resource management. Journal of Environmental Management, 90(5), 1933–1949. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.01.001

Stanturf, J.A., Kant, P., Lillesø, J.-P.B., Mansourian, S., Kleine, M., Graudal, L., & Madsen, P. (2015). Forest landscape restoration as a key component of climate change mitigation and adaptation. IUFRO World Series, 34. International Union of Forest Research Organizations.

Thapa, M.S., Baral, S., & Khanal Chhetri, B.B. (2025). Institutional dynamics in community-based forest restoration: A systematic review on ecological and socio-economic outcomes. Discover Sustainability, 6, 1235. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-025-02111-x

Ullah, A. (2024). Forest landscape restoration and its impact on social cohesion, ecosystems, and rural livelihoods: Lessons learned from Pakistan. Regional Environmental Change, 24, 26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-024-02198-4

Wahyuningrum, N., & Putra, P.B. (2019). Degraded land analyses of Brantas River Basin to support land rehabilitation. Jurnal Penelitian Kehutanan Wallacea, 8(2), 135–145. https://doi.org/10.18330/jwallacea.2019.vol8iss2pp135-145

Wiegant, D., van Oel, P., & Dewulf, A. (2022). Scale-sensitive governance in forest and landscape restoration: A systematic review. Regional Environmental Change, 22(1), 25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-022-01889-0

Wortley, L., Hero, J.-M., & Howes, M. (2013). Evaluating ecological restoration success: A review of the literature. Restoration Ecology, 21(5), 537–543. https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.12028

Cover
Published
2026-08-24
How to Cite
Hartati, H., Rosmalah, S., & Sarwati, S. (2026). Multidimensional Sustainability Analysis of Forest and Land Rehabilitation Program in Bombana Regency, Southeast Sulawesi, Indonesia. Jurnal Teknik Pertanian Lampung (Journal of Agricultural Engineering), 15(4), 1397–1408. https://doi.org/10.23960/jtepl.v15i4.1397-1408