Comparative Analysis of Traditional and Modern Broiler Farms Using Google Colab t-test and Data Visualization

  • Galuh Adi Insani
    Universitas Gadjah Mada
  • Bayu Dwi Apri Nugroho
    Universitas Gadjah Mada
  • Ahmad Romadhoni Surya Putra
    Universitas Gadjah Mada
  • Andri Prima Nugroho
    Universitas Gadjah Mada
DOI: https://doi.org/10.23960/jtepl.v15i2.487-498
Keywords Data analysis, Data mining, Google Colab, Modern farming systems, Traditional farming systems
Abstract Views (Last 12 Months)
224 Abstract Views
182 Downloads

Abstract

This study aims to compare production performance between modern and traditional broiler farming systems in Indonesia and to evaluate the potential of digital data recording for decision-making support. Despite high feed prices, welfare concerns, and socioeconomic constraints, many farmers utilize modern technology to enhance their efficiency. Due to cost and production, many traditional farmers continue to use traditional farming practices. Production data were collected from modern and traditional farms in Gunungkidul District, Yogyakarta Province. Data were analyzed using Python-based t-tests and correlation heatmaps in the Google Colab environment. Data analysis revealed significant differences (p < 0.01) in feed intake (FI) and performance index (PI), but not in body weight (BW), average daily gain (ADG), or feed conversion ratio (FCR). Traditional and modern farming systems differ in FI and PI. Heatmaps enhance understanding of correlations, revealing a high association between FI, BW, and FCR (r ≥ 0.70), whereas modest relationships exist between FI, BW, and ADG. The results enable farmers to determine whether to enhance elements with moderate and strong correlations or solely those with strong correlations; they also permit the cooperative to assess farmers’ production based on broiler production and management practices.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abdollahi, M.R., Zaefarian, F., & Ravindran, V. (2018). Feed intake response of broilers: Impact of feed processing. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 237, 154-165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2018.01.013

Akhiroh, P., Dinata, J.M., & Nugroho, E. (2023). The feasibility of broiler farming in a partnership model. BIO Web of Conferences, 81, 00020. https://doi.org/10.1051/bioconf/20238100020

Ali, M.S., & Hossain, M.M. (2010). Factors influencing the performance of farmers in broiler production of Faridpur District in Bangladesh. World's Poultry Science Journal, 66(1), 123–131. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043933910000127

Longgy, D.H.A., & Widianingrum, D.C. (2024). Sebuah reviu: Aplikasi teknologi peternakan modern dan strategi pemasaran inovatif untuk meningkatkan nilai tambah produk peternakan. JIPHO (Jurnal Ilmiah Peternakan Halu Oleo), 6(4), 304–317. https://doi.org/10.56625/jipho.v6i4.151

Baráth, L., Fertő, I., & Staniszewski, J. (2024). Are technological or efficiency differences more pronounced between Hungarian and Polish poultry farms? A stochastic metafrontier analysis. Agricultural Economics (Czech), 70(8), 406–413. https://doi.org/10.17221/322/2023-AGRICECON

Bird, H.R. (1955). “Performance index” of growing chickens. Poultry Science, 34(5), 1163–1164. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0341163

Cozannet, P., Davin, R., Jlali, M., Jachacz, J., Preynat, A., & Molist, F. (2021). Dietary metabolizable energy, digestible lysine, available phosphorus levels and exogenous enzymes affect broiler chicken performance. Animal, 15(5), 100206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.animal.2021.100206

Deaton, J.W., McNaughton, J.L., & Lott, B.D. (1983). The effect of dietary energy level and broiler body weight on abdominal fat. Poultry Science, 62(12), 2394–2397. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0622394

Dehghani-Tafti, N., & Jahanian, R. (2016). Effect of supplemental organic acids on performance, carcass characteristics, and serum biochemical metabolites in broilers fed diets containing different crude protein levels. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 211, 109–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2015.09.019

Eits, R.M., Kwakkel, R.P., & Verstegen, M.W.A. (2002). Nutrition affects fat-free body composition in broiler chickens. The Journal of Nutrition, 132(8), 2222–2228. https://doi.org/10.1093/jn/132.8.2222

El-Maghawry, H.A.M. (2024). Estimating greenhouse gas emissions from broiler chicken production systems using life cycle assessment. Misr Journal of Agricultural Engineering, 41(2), 185-204. https://doi.org/10.21608/mjae.2024.268019.1131

Fotou, E., Moulasioti, V., Papadopoulos, G.A., Kyriakou, D., Boti, M.-E., Moussis, V., Papadami, M., Tellis, C., Patsias, A., Sarrigeorgiou, I., Theodoridis, A., Lymberi, P., Tsiouris, V., Tsikaris, V., & Tsoukatos, D. (2024). Effect of farming system type on broilers’ antioxidant status, performance, and carcass traits: An industrial-scale production study. Sustainability, 16(11), 4782. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16114782

Franco, E.A.P., & de Alencar Nääs, I. (2022). Development of a performance model for classifying broiler farms. Journal of the Indonesian Tropical Animal Agriculture, 47(1), 65–75. https://doi.org/10.14710/jitaa.47.1.65-75

Hendrikus, H., Setyanigsih, F.A., & Suhardi, S. (2022). Sistem pengontrolan dan monitoring pada kandang ayam broiler berbasis Internet of Things (IoT). Jurnal Informatika dan Rekayasa Perangkat Lunak, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.33365/jatika.v3i1.1922

Honig, H., Haron, A., Plitman, L., Lokshtanov, D., Shinder, D., Nagar, S., Goshen, T., & Druyan, S. (2024). Comparative analysis of broiler housing systems: Implications for production and wellbeing. Animals, 14(11), 1665. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14111665

Iriani, J., Sitorus, N., Gunoro, Abdullah, Cholish, Wahyudi, Meliala, M.D., & Hasibuan, R.D. (2024). Realtime broiler chicken cage control and monitoring system. International Journal of Applied Research and Sustainable Sciences, 2(5). https://doi.org/10.59890/ijarss.v2i5.1810

Kebede, F.G., Komen, H., Dessie, T., Hanotte, O., Kemp, S., Alemu, S.W., & Bastiaansen, J.W.M. (2023). Agroecologies defined by species distribution models improve model fit of genotype by environment interactions to identify the best performing chicken breeds for smallholder systems. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2023.1305799

Lase, J.A., Afnan, R., Wulandari, Z., Estuningsih, S., Sartika, T., & Sumantri, C. (2023). Morphometric analysis of IPB-D1 chicken in free-range and intensive rearing systems in the tropics region. BIO Web of Conferences, 81, 00024. https://doi.org/10.1051/bioconf/20238100024

Massuquetto, A., Durau, J.F., Schramm, V.G., Netto, M.V.T., Krabbe, E.L., & Maiorka, A. (2018). Influence of feed form and conditioning time on pellet quality, performance and ileal nutrient digestibility in broilers. Journal of Applied Poultry Research, 27(1), 51–58. https://doi.org/10.3382/japr/pfx039

Massuquetto, A., Panisson, J.C., Marx, F.O., Surek, D., Krabbe, E.L., & Maiorka, A. (2019). Effect of pelleting and different feeding programs on growth performance, carcass yield, and nutrient digestibility in broiler chickens. Poultry Science, 98(11), 5497–5503. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pez176

Morato, C.H.O., Farinha, M.J.U.S., & Bernardo, L.V.M. (2024). Agricultural census reports on environmental issues in rural properties (Version 1) [Preprint]. Research Square. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-5234977/v1

Ndlebe, L., Tyler, N.C., & Ciacciariello, M. (2023). Effect of varying levels of dietary energy and protein on broiler performance: A review. World's Poultry Science Journal, 79, 449–465. https://doi.org/10.1080/00439339.2023.2225795

Paymode, A.S., & Malode, V.B. (2022). Transfer learning for multi-crop leaf disease image classification using convolutional neural network VGG. Artificial Intelligence in Agriculture, 6, 23–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aiia.2021.12.002

Quintana-Ospina, G.A., Alfaro-Wisaquillo, M.C., Oviedo-Rondon, E.O., Ruiz-Ramirez, J.R., Bernal-Arango, L.C., & Martinez-Bernal, G.D. (2023). Data analytics of broiler growth dynamics and feed conversion ratio of broilers raised to 35 d under commercial tropical conditions. Animals, 13(15), 2447. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13152447

Ramadhani, A., Nurgiartiningsih, V.M.A., & Sjofjan, O. (2023). Effect of level of metabolizable energy on the breast and wing weight of local chickens: A meta-analysis. BIO Web of Conferences, 81, 00027. https://doi.org/10.1051/bioconf/20238100027

Sa’ad, M.Q., Sumiati, S., Afnan, R., & Fadilah, R. (2025). Improving broiler chicken farming management in closed houses. Jurnal Ilmu Produksi dan Teknologi Hasil Peternakan, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.29244/jipthp.13.1.1-7

Salas, C., Ekmay, R.D., England, J., Cerrate, S., & Coon, C.N. (2019). Effect of body weight and energy intake on body composition analysis of broiler breeder hens. Poultry Science, 98(2), 796–802. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pey377

Sari, I.A.P.L., Susrusa, K.B., & Dewi, I.A.L. (2021). The income comparison of broiler farming that used closed house system and open house system. SOCA: Jurnal Sosial Ekonomi Pertanian, 15(2). https://doi.org/10.24843/SOCA.2021.v15.i02.p12

Schober, P., & Vetter, T.R. (2020). Correlation analysis in medical research. Anesthesia & Analgesia, 130(2), 332. https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000004578

Sun, G., Li, F., & Jiang, W. (2019). Brief talk about big data graph analysis and visualization. Journal on Big Data, 1(1), 25–38. https://doi.org/10.32604/jbd.2019.05800

Tauson, R. (1998). Health and production in improved cage designs. Poultry Science, 77(12), 1820–1827. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/77.12.1820

Tauson, R. (2002). Furnished cages and aviaries: Production and health. World’s Poultry Science Journal, 58(1), 49–63. https://doi.org/10.1079/WPS20020007

Tribudi, Y.A., Natsir, M.H., Ulfah, M., Gusmalawati, D., Sari. A.P.Z.N.L., Hariyono, D.N.H., Prihandini, P.W., & Nurgiartiningsih, V.M.A. (2023). Tukong: a rumpless indigenous chicken breed from West Kalimantan, Indonesia. World’s Poultry Science Journal, 79(2), 403–417. https://doi.org/10.1080/00439339.2023.2203347

Vanda, H., Titania, T., Sari, W. E., Hambal, M., & Gani, F. A. (2023). Performance of broiler chickens reared in postal, stage, and closed house cage. Jurnal Medika Veterinaria, 17(1). https://doi.org/10.21157/j.med.vet..v17i1.32709

Cover
Published
2026-04-17
How to Cite
Insani, G. A., Nugroho, B. D. A., Putra, A. R. S., & Nugroho, A. P. (2026). Comparative Analysis of Traditional and Modern Broiler Farms Using Google Colab t-test and Data Visualization. Jurnal Teknik Pertanian Lampung (Journal of Agricultural Engineering), 15(2), 487–498. https://doi.org/10.23960/jtepl.v15i2.487-498