The Effect of Thermal and Alkaline Pretreatment in POME (Palm Oil Mill Effluent) as a Substrate for Dark Fermentation Process on Biohydrogen Production

  • Amna Citra Farhani
    Institut Teknologi Sumatera
  • Bintang Sipartogi Panjaitan
    Universitas Riau
  • Ni Wayan Arya Utari
    Institut Teknologi Sumatera
DOI: https://doi.org/10.23960/jtepl.v15i3.1222-1231
Keywords Biohydrogen, Dark fermentation, Oxidation–reduction potential (ORP), POME, Thermophilic fermentation
Abstract Views (Last 12 Months)
22 Abstract Views
23 Downloads

Abstract

Palm Oil Mill Effluent (POME) is a promising substrate for biohydrogen production through dark fermentation, although pretreatment is often required to enhance hydrogenogenic activity. This study evaluated the effects of alkaline (NaOH) and thermal pretreatments on POME characteristics and hydrogen production. Fresh POME was sieved and adjusted to initial pH values of 6, 7, or 8 using 6 M NaOH, with or without heat shock treatment (100 °C for 60 min). Batch fermentation was conducted at 60 °C for 24 h, while pH, oxidation-reduction potential (ORP), and dissolved oxygen (DO) were monitored. Pretreatment shifted POME conditions from acidic and oxidative to neutral-alkaline and reductive environments, with several treatments achieving ORP values below −200 mV, indicating favorable anaerobic conditions. Refrigerated storage reduced pH and increased ORP, whereas NaOH addition increased pH and lowered ORP. Hydrogen production varied among treatments. The highest yield was obtained from fresh POME adjusted to pH 7, producing 0.03655 g H₂ with an ORP of approximately −514 mV. In contrast, stored POME subjected to pH 7 adjustment and heat shock produced substantially lower hydrogen yields. In a second batch, pH 8 treatments generated 0.01157–0.02002 g H₂, representing 2.4–3.1 times higher production than the controls, while pH 6 treatments showed the lowest yields. Overall, neutral-to-alkaline pH and strongly negative ORP were associated with improved biohydrogen production.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Barth, M., Werner, M., Otto, P., Richwien, B., Bahramsari, S., Krause, M., Schwan, B., & Abendroth, C. (2024). Microwave-assisted organic acids and green hydrogen production during mixed culture fermentation. Biotechnology for Biofuels and Bioproducts, 17, 123. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13068-024-02573-7

Bundhoo, M.A.Z., Mohee, R., & Hassan, M.A. (2015). Effects of pre-treatment technologies on dark fermentative biohydrogen production: A review. Journal of Environmental Management, 157, 20–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.04.006

Cabrol, L., Marone, A., Tapia-Venegas, E., Steyer, J.-P., Ruiz-Filippi, G., & Trably, E. (2017). Microbial ecology of fermentative hydrogen producing bioprocesses: Useful insights for driving the ecosystem function. FEMS Microbiology Reviews, 41(2), 158–181. https://doi.org/10.1093/femsre/fuw043

Chou, K.W., Norli, I., & Anees, A. (2010). Evaluation of the effect of temperature, NaOH concentration and time on solubilization of palm oil mill effluent (POME) using response surface methodology (RSM). Bioresource Technology, 101(22), 8616–8622. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2010.06.101

Chen, Y., Yin, Y., & Wang, J. (2021). Recent advance in inhibition of dark fermentative hydrogen production. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 46(7), 5053–5073. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.11.096

Gómez-Camacho, C. E., Pellicer Alborch, K., Bockisch, A., Neubauer, P., Junne, S., & Ruggeri, B. (2021). Monitoring the physiological state in the dark fermentation of maize/grass silage using flow cytometry and electrooptic polarizability measurements. BioEnergy Research, 14, 910–923. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12155-020-10184-x

Gupta, S., Fernandes, A., Lopes, A., Grasa, L., & Salafranca, J. (2024). Microbes and parameters influencing dark fermentation for hydrogen production. Applied Sciences, 14(23), Article 10789. https://doi.org/10.3390/app142310789

Hongo, M., Ishizaki, A., & Uyeda, M. (1972). Studies on oxidation-reduction potentials (ORP) of microbial cultures: Part I. L-glutamic acid fermentation. Agricultural and Biological Chemistry, 36(1), 141–145. https://doi.org/10.1080/00021369.1972. 10860221

Khadaroo, S. N. B. A., Poh, P. E., Gouwanda, D., & Grassia, P. (2019). Applicability of various pretreatment techniques to enhance the anaerobic digestion of Palm Oil Mill Effluent (POME): A review. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 7(5), 103310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2019.103310

Kim, D.-H., Kim, S.-H., & Shin, H.-S. (2009). Sodium inhibition of fermentative hydrogen production. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 34(8), 3295–3304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2009.02.051

Lee, M.-J., Kim, T.-H., Min, B., & Hwang, S.-J. (2012). Sodium (Na⁺) concentration effects on metabolic pathway and estimation of ATP use in dark fermentation hydrogen production through stoichiometric analysis. Journal of Environmental Management, 108, 22–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.04.027

Lee, P., Hwang, Y., & Lee, T. (2019). Fermentative bio-hydrogen production of food waste in the presence of different concentrations of salt (Na⁺) and nitrogen. Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, 29(2), 283–291. https://doi.org/10.4014/jmb.1808.08023

Liu, C.-G., Hao, X.-M., Lin, Y.-H., & Bai, F.-W. (2016). Redox potential driven aeration during very-high-gravity ethanol fermentation by using flocculating yeast. Scientific Reports, 6, Article 25763. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep25763

Osman, A. I., Deka, T. J., Baruah, D. C., & Rooney, D. W. (2023). Critical challenges in biohydrogen production processes from the organic feedstocks. Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery, 13, 8383–8401. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-020-00965-x

Primeia, S., Hastuti, Z., Nursa’adah, R., Finalis, E., Destian, E., Prijanto, U., Darmawan, A., & Listiani Dewi, E. (2025). Investigating the microbial community dynamics in biohydrogen production from palm oil mill effluent (POME) with molasses addition under mesophilic condition. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 138, 1303–1314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene. 2024.11.276

Sim, X. Y., Tan, J. P., He, N., Yeap, S. K., Hui, Y. W., Luthfi, A. A. I., Manaf, S. F. A., Bukhari, N. A., & Jamali, N. S. (2023). Unraveling the effect of redox potential on dark fermentative hydrogen production. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 187, 113755. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2023.113755

Syaichurrozi, I., Hidayatullah, M. A., Nurullah, A., Suhendi, E., Kustiningsih, I., Susanti, D. Y., Darsono, N., Primeia, S., & Khaerudini, D. S. (2025). Enhanced biohydrogen production from palm oil mill effluent using single-stage process of dark fermentation and microbial electrolysis cell at various initial pHs. Renewable Energy, 249, 123161. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.renene.2025.123161

Vongvichiankul, C., Deebao, J., & Khongnakorn, W. (2017). Relationship between pH, oxidation reduction potential (ORP) and biogas production in mesophilic screw anaerobic digester. Energy Procedia, 138, 877–882. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro. 2017.10.113

Zainal, B. S., Zaini, S., Zinatizadeh, A. A., Mohd, N. S., Ibrahim, S., Ker, P. J., & Mohamed, H. (2023). Preliminary investigation of different types of inoculums and substrate preparation for biohydrogen production. Fermentation, 9(2), Article 127. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation9020127

Zainal, B. S., Yu, K. L., Mohamed, H., Ong, H. C., & Mahlia, T. M. I. (2024). Hydrothermal pretreatment: A sustainable approach to biohydrogen production from palm oil mill effluent. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments, 72, 104062. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seta.2024.104062

Cover
Published
2026-06-29
How to Cite
Farhani, A. C., Panjaitan, B. S., & Utari, N. W. A. (2026). The Effect of Thermal and Alkaline Pretreatment in POME (Palm Oil Mill Effluent) as a Substrate for Dark Fermentation Process on Biohydrogen Production. Jurnal Teknik Pertanian Lampung (Journal of Agricultural Engineering), 15(3), 1222–1231. https://doi.org/10.23960/jtepl.v15i3.1222-1231