Effects of Binary and Ternary Biomass Blending on Updraft Gasification Performance, Syngas Composition, and Flame Characteristics
Abstract
The increasing global energy demand and environmental concerns associated with fossil fuels have intensified interest in renewable energy, particularly biomass. Agricultural residues such as rice husk (RH), corn cob (CC), and reed biomass (RB) are abundant resources that can be converted into energy through gasification. This study aimed to compare the gasification performance and flame characteristics of these feedstocks and their binary and ternary blends and to identify conditions for improved performance. Experiments were conducted using a fixed-bed updraft gasifier with a constant feedstock mass of 1 kg per run. RH was used in its raw form, whereas CC and RB were ground to 10–30 mm. Airflow rates ranged from 1.8 to 2.8 m³/h by adjusting blower speed. Flame characteristics were analyzed from digital images using ImageJ. CC showed the highest gasification efficiency (72.8%) and gas yield (2.65 Nm³/kg), whereas RH showed the lowest values (61.4% and 2.10 Nm³/kg), attributed to its high ash content. Blending improved performance, with the RH+CC+RB mixture achieving the highest efficiency (74.8%) and gas yield (2.80 Nm³/kg). The ternary blend also produced higher CO (24.9%) and H₂ (21.7%) and lower CO₂ (11.3%), with a strong blue flame, maximum blue flame intensity of 82.6%, and flame temperature of 980 °C. These findings demonstrate that feedstock blending can enhance biomass gasification and syngas combustion performance.
Downloads
References
Abdulhussein, H.J., Al-Qassab, M.R., & Al-Naffakh, J. (2025). Engineering an eco-friendly rice husk combustion stove for sustainable energy access in low-income and remote regions. Acta Technica Corviniensis – Bulletin of Engineering, 18(1), 65–70.
Adeoye, O.O., Lora, E.E.S., Andrade, R.V., Pupo, L.P., & Jaén, R.L. (2026). Review of entrained flow co-gasification technology of biomass with different fuels. Fuel, 404, 136420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2025.136420
Alabi, O.O., Gbadeyan, O.J., Towoju, O.A., & Deenadayalu, N. (2024). Enhancing sustainable energy production through biomass gasification gas technology: A review. F1000Research, 13, Article 511. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.147958.2
Al-Naffakh, J., Al-Qassab, M.R., & Al-Makhzoomi, Z.M.H. (2021). Share of CO2 emissions in Iraq, Saudi Arabia and Kuwait from the combustion of fossil fuels: A statistical study. Journal of Research Technology & Engineering, 2(3), 114–120.
Al-Naffakh, J., Al-Qassab, M.R., & Jafar, I. (2025). Assessment of carbon intensity dynamics in electricity generation: A comparative analysis of Middle Eastern countries (2013-2023). Al-Furat Journal of Innovations in Mechanical and Sustainable Energy Engineering, 2(1), 47-61.
Awasthi, M.K., Sar, T., Gowd, S.C., Rajendran, K., Kumar, V., Sarsaiya, S., Li, Y., Sindhu, R., Binod, P., Zhang, Z., Pandey, A., & Taherzadeh, M.J. (2023). A comprehensive review on thermochemical, and biochemical conversion methods of lignocellulosic biomass into valuable end product. Fuel, 342, Article 127790. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2023.127790
Bao, Y., Yu, Q., Xie, H., Qin, Q., & Zhao, Y. (2023). Effect of H2 and CO in syngas on oxy-MILD combustion. Applied Energy, 352, 122025. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2023.122025
Bashir, M.F., Pata, U.K., & Shahzad, L. (2025). Linking climate change, energy transition and renewable energy investments to combat energy security risks: Evidence from top energy consuming economies. Energy, 314, Article 134175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2024.134175
Calvo-Flores, F.G., & Martin-Martinez, F.J. (2022). Biorefineries: Achievements and challenges for a bio-based economy. Frontiers in Chemistry, 10, Article 973417. https://doi.org/10.3389/fchem.2022.973417
Cao, Y., Wen, X., Zhang, S., Zhu, Y., Shen, F., Li, J., & Liu, J. (2025). High-efficiency steam catalytic co-gasification of corncob mediated by corncob char supported catalyst to produce H2 rich synthesis gas. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 109, 591–604. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2025.02.028
Çetintaş, S., & Taştan, M. (2026). Effect of DC non-transfer plasma combustion of methane diffusion flames on emission and flame characteristics. Combustion Science and Technology. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/00102202.2026. 2647242
Dai, Y., Sun, M., Fang, H., Yao, H., Chen, J., Tan, J., Mu, L., & Zhu, Y. (2024). Co-combustion of binary and ternary blends of industrial sludge, lignite and pine sawdust via thermogravimetric analysis: Thermal behaviors, interaction effects, kinetics evaluation, and artificial neural network modeling. Renewable Energy, 220, 119610. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2023.119610
Gomaa, M.R., Matarneh, G.A., Shalby, M., & AL-Rawashdeh, H.A. (2021). A state of the art review on a thermochemical conversion of carbonaceous materials: Production of synthesis gas by co-gasification process- Part I. Current Alternative Energy, 4(1), Article e070322185569. https://doi.org/10.2174/2405463104999200904115100
Guo, C., Qu, N., Xu, Z., Jia, Y., Hou, M., & Tong, L. (2026). Progress in biomass combustion systems for ultra-low emissions. Energies, 19(7), 1648. https://doi.org/10.3390/en19071648
Ivanova, T.A., Paramonova, K., Talipov, O., Tanyrbergenov, N., Zhakupov, T., & Akayev, A. (2024). Assessment of common reed (Phragmites australis (Cav.) Trin. ex Steud.) biomass suitability for solid biofuels production. Sustainability, 16(17), 7378. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16177378
Kaniapan, S., Pasupuleti, J., Nesan, K.P., Abubackar, H.N., Umar, H.A., Oladosu, T.L., Bello, S.R., & Rene, E.R. (2022). A review of the sustainable utilization of rice residues for bioenergy conversion using different valorization techniques, their challenges, and techno-economic assessment. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(6), 3427. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19063427.
Khandaker, T., Islam, T., Nandi, A., Anik, M.A.A.M., Hossain, M.S., Hasan, M.K., & Hossain, M.S. (2025). Biomass-derived carbon materials for sustainable energy applications: A comprehensive review. Sustainable Energy & Fuels, 9(3), 693–723. https://doi.org/10.1039/d4se01393j
Koundinya, K.K., Dobhal, P., Ahmad, T., Mondal, S., Sharma, A.K., & Singh, V.K. (2023). A technical review on thermochemical pathways for production of energy from corncob residue. Renewable Energy Focus, 44, 174–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ref.2022.12.007
Kumar, A., Pandey, D.S., & Mondal, T. (2025). Experimental investigation of process parameters for hydrogen-rich syngas production from rice husk gasification. Sustainable Chemistry for Climate Action, 6, 100061. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scca.2025.100061
Li, W., Fang, Y., Chang, S., Mi, S., & Zhao, S. (2025). Synergistic effects of biomass components and coal co-gasification: insights from thermogravimetric and reactor analysis. Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery, 15, 20601–20613. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-025-06621-6
Liu, S., Ben-Abdelwahed, A., Gaborieau, C., & Lachaud, J. (2025). Biomass char gasification for hydrogen production: A thermodynamic equilibrium analysis. Fuel Processing Technology, 276, 108279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2025.108279
Muchammad., Setioputro, N.T., Syaiful, Fawwaz, T.N., & Kosim, M. (2026). Comparative study of dried, soaked, and intermittent corn cob feedstocks on the performance of open downdraft gasifiers. Bioresource Technology Reports, 34, 102630. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biteb.2026.102630
Nayak, P.P., & Datta, A.K. (2025). An entropy-based TOPSIS approach for selecting best suitable rice husk for potential energy applications: pyrolysis kinetics and characterization of rice husk and rice husk ash. Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery, 15, 21789–21806. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-022-02824-3
Niyogi, A., Sarkar, P., Bhattacharyya, S., Pal, S., & Mukherjee, S. (2025). Harnessing the potential of agriculture biomass: Reuse, transformation and applications in energy and environment. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 32, 19180–19203. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-024-34232-7
Puri, L., Hu, Y., & Naterer, G. (2024). Critical review of the role of ash content and composition in biomass pyrolysis. Frontiers in Fuels, 2, 1378361. https://doi.org/10.3389/ffuel.2024.1378361
Saini, R., Chinthapudi, E., & Pothal, J.K. (2026). Extracting the energy-potential values of dolochar via an integrated steam co-gasification route with petcoke and biomass waste. Waste Management, 209, 115204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2025. 115204
Segneri, V. (2025). Simulation and advanced modeling of innovative waste-to-chemicals plants in the circular economy: Gasification of refuse derived fuel. [Doctoral Dissertation], Università degli Studi di Roma "La Sapienza". Institutional Repository UNITESI. https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14242/211123
Shi, J., Sun, G., Liu, W., Zhan, D., Chen, B., Qu, Z., Wang, C., Li, H., Zhang, H., Shi, Z., Yu, M., Dou, W., Meng, L., & Xu, H. (2026). Progress and perspectives in biomass gasification focusing on feedstock characteristics and system adaptability. International Journal of Chemical Engineering, 2026, 8172320. https://doi.org/10.1155/ijce/8172320
Siddiqui, M.Z., Sheraz, M., Toor, U.A., Anus, A., Mahmood, A., Haseeb, M., Ibrahim, M., Khoo, K.S., Devadas, V.V., Mubashir, M., Ullah, S., & Show, P.L. (2025). Recent approaches on the optimization of biomass gasification process parameters for product H2 and syngas ratio: a review. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 27, 22605–22633. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-022-02279-6
Su, B., Wang, Y., Luo, Z., Hao, R., Liu, L., Zhou, S., & Wang, T. (2026). Flame evolution behavior of syngas/air mixtures with a large range of equivalence ratios: Examination from the perspective of dynamics and thermal effects. Fuel, 407, 137356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2025.137356
Taweesan, A., Lalitaporn, P., Sooktawee, S., & Kanabkaew, T. (2025). Mitigating air quality and climate impact: A comprehensive analysis of paddy field burning emissions and green mechanisms for sustainable agriculture. Environmental and Sustainability Indicators, 26, Article 100662. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indic.2025.100662
Wang, J., & Azam, W. (2024). Natural resource scarcity, fossil fuel energy consumption, and total greenhouse gas emissions in top emitting countries. Geoscience Frontiers, 15(2), Article 101757. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsf.2023.101757
Wang, K., Yan, X., Zheng, Y., Dang, J., Yao, S., Wang, W., Yang, P., Zhao, S., & Hu, J. (2026). Hydrogen production via gasification of corn stover photo-fermentation Residue: Catalytic mechanism of alkali metals. Bioresource Technology, 428, 134503. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2026.134503
Zhang, X., Zhao, L., Yao, Z., Jia, J., Sun, Y., & Huo, L. (2025). Enhanced hydrogen production and carbon suppression via a two-stage catalytic system of biochar pre-catalysis and Ni-based catalysts during biomass pyrolysis. Biochar, 7, 120. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42773-025-00533-4
Zhang, Y., Wan, L., Guan, J., Xiong, Q., Zhang, S., & Jin, X. (2020). A review on biomass gasification: Effect of main parameters on char generation and reaction. Energy & Fuels, 34(11), 13438–13455. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.0c02900
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
ARTICLE TEMPLATE 
